Meghan Markle expresses outrage at Lady C for speaking out against Marcus Anderson, alleging he leaked her secrets to Scooby and influenced the book ‘Endgame’. However, Scooby’s attempts to captivate readers with revelations appear to have failed, with early reviews suggesting a rather poor reception. Scooby is seen as sympathetic towards Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, with his past relationships hinting at a friendly relationship and an unofficial spokesperson role. Claims abound that the Sussexes and Scooby are trying to distance themselves.
Despite Scooby’s efforts, even the typically Sussex-friendly New York Times gave mediocre reviews, comparing the “Endgame” chapter to a press release written by Chip PT, much like Prince Harry’s travel memoir. The publication warns fans not to expect any groundbreaking revelations, warning them against anticipating anything beyond a repetition of well-known information due to what they describe as ruthless writing. While Scooby devotes a section of the book to setting the record straight on the Sussexes’ fallout with the royal family, it is acknowledged that other members of the family do not receive the same positive treatment as Harry and Meghan.
The book claims Marcus Anderson as the source of its content, claiming that Megan confided in him and that he provided the details. The connection between Scooby and Anderson has existed for a long time, and it is suspected that Anderson played a central role in passing on information. Contrary to Scooby’s efforts to present a positive image, the New York Times suggests that Marcus Anderson is the source of the final season’s content.
Royal commentator Jenny Bond says sources close to Buckingham Palace as well as Prince William and Princess Kate have provided information and accounts about the book. Expressing skepticism, Bond questions the credibility of these close friends openly discussing private matters with Scooby.
The Dutch translation of Scooby’s book, released worldwide, introduces a controversial claim that King Charles made racist comments towards Archie. However, King Charles says British law prevents him from disclosing details, raising questions about how the Dutch version appears to reveal the identity of the royal involved. ITV’s Chris Ship expresses his confusion, pointing out the ambiguity surrounding how the Dutch translation could mistakenly name the royal if such details were not present in the original English version. Additionally, it’s worth noting that Prince Harry clarified in an ITV interview that he has never explicitly accused anyone of being racist.
