Princess Anne Critiques Meghan Markle’s Latest Interview as Fraudulent and Misleading

The palace has now responded, sparking calls for an investigation into Meghan’s claims. Yet questions about the accusations themselves are surfacing. Let’s take a quick look back at Meghan’s interview: She spoke about her mental health struggles as a member of the royal family, her feelings of lack of support, and her plans to take her own life, which she said was is carried out without the help of the palace. Most shockingly, she mentioned concerns within the royal family about the dark color of her son Archie’s skin before his birth, implying racial concerns among the royal family.

These allegations have sparked fierce debate. Supporters view Meghan’s revelations as evidence of institutional racism within the monarchy, while critics accuse her of attacking the Queen and Prince Harry’s family to boost her career in Hollywood. Amid increased scrutiny, Buckingham Palace initially released a brief 61-word statement acknowledging the concerns raised, including around race, and promising to address them privately. Now, in the face of increased scrutiny, the palace is reportedly preparing a more comprehensive rebuttal to Meghan’s claims.

It is essential to examine the credibility of Meghan’s accusations, although it is crucial to approach this question objectively without definitive answers. While some aspects may correspond to known facts, others seem inconsistent or unverifiable. For example, reports indicate that Meghan received medical treatment from palace doctors during her alleged mental health crisis, contradicting her portrait of neglect. Additionally, Prince William quickly denied the accusation of racist discussions about Archie’s skin color, highlighting the discrepancies in Meghan’s account.

Critics say Meghan’s account is intentionally ambiguous, making it difficult to refute specific details. Additionally, his failure to express sympathy for the Queen following Prince Philip’s death, coupled with the interview’s alignment with past criticism from the British press, raises questions about his motives. Speculation suggests Meghan could use the interview to call out tabloid mistreatment.

Nonetheless, categorically dismissing Meghan’s experiences due to factual inconsistencies risks overlooking broader issues of mental health and racial discrimination. The palace’s initial silence heightened concerns about their willingness to seriously address these issues, particularly in light of previous controversies surrounding Meghan and Harry’s departure from royal duties. However, the stronger response they are planning demonstrates recognition of the need to directly confront these allegations.

Moving forward, Buckingham Palace faces the challenge of restoring public trust by transparently addressing each of Meghan’s allegations with context and evidence where possible. Restoring their credibility depends on unequivocally demonstrating that racism and mistreatment have no place in royal households. This ongoing saga highlights the complexity and sensitivity of the issues involved, with the potential for further revelations to emerge over time.


Hey, I am Avijit... I am mostly addicted to films, music, cricket, and football—and not necessarily in that order....

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply